News

Article

Non-P42 MOG-IgG Serotype Predicts Worsened Disease Progression, Relapse Rate in MOGAD

Author(s):

Patients with non-P42 MOG-IgG in MOGAD had over three times higher risk of relapsing course than those with P42 MOG-IgG.

Fabienne Brilot-Turville, PhD, a professor of neuroimmunology at the University of Sydney

Fabienne Brilot-Turville, PhD

In a recently published study of patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG-seropositive confirmed MOG antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), data revealed that those with non-P42 MOG-IgG, a non-dominant MOG epitope, was associated with a significantly increased risk of relapsing course. Overall, these findings suggest that non-P42 MOG-IgG may be the first diagnostic predictor of relapsing course in a distinct subgroup of MOGAD.1

Published in Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, the study featured 202 adult patients with MOGAD, 150 (74%) of which had MOG-IgG that recognized the immunodominant proline 42 (P42) epitope and 115 (57%) of which recognized histidine 103/serine 104 (H103/S104). Conducted from January 2013 to June 2022, the study followed patients for a minimum of 1 year (median follow-up, 4 years [IQR, 2.2-7.2])

Between the groups, 82% (44 of 52) of patients with non-P42 MOG-IgG had a relapsing course, compared with 62% (93 of 150) of patients with P42 MOG-IgG. This association remained true when patient sera were tested with an anti-human IgG1 secondary antibody, in which 41 of 45 patients with non-P42 MOG-IgG were confirmed. Notably, there was no change in the risk of having a relapsing course based on H103/S104 epitope status (HR, 1; 95% CI, 0.66-1.43; P = .891).

Led by senior author Fabienne Brilot-Turville, PhD, a professor of neuroimmunology at the University of Sydney, the study determined serum MOG-IgG and epitope binding by validated flow cytometry live cell-based assays. Using a univariate Cox proportional hazard model, patients with non-P42 MOG-IgG had 70% of increased risk of a relapsing course compared with those whose MOG-IgG bound P42 (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.15-2.60; P = .009).

"A biological explanation for the association between non-P42-targeting MOG-IgG and enhanced likelihood of relapsing disease in MOGAD has not yet been proposed," Brilot-Turville et al wrote. Comparatively, it is possible that non-P42-targeting MOG-IgG can bind to MOG at low titers despite most MOG-IgG having low affinity, ultimately resulting in a relapse attack, whereas P42 epitope-binding MOG-IgG may require greater IgG levels to trigger a relapse."

While H103/S104 epitope status alone didn’t have an effect on relapsing course, the combination of a non-P42 and non-H103/S104 epitope had a higher risk of exhibiting a relapse course than the combination of P42 and non-H103/S104 epitope (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.26-4.84; P = .009). Furthermore, the duration of relapse-freedom was significantly longer in patients with a P42 epitope than those with a non-P42 epitope (log-rank test, median time to first relapse, 2.7 years [95% CI, 1.54-5.99] vs 0.9 years [95% CI, 0.51-3.41]; P = .0079).

A subsequent analysis examined patients based on the phenotype at onset: optic neuritis (OR), unilateral optic neuritis (UON), bilateral optic neuritis (BON), transverse myelitis (TM), or brain. Of patients presenting with ON, those with non-P42 MOG-IgG exhibited an 80% increased risk of a relapsing course compared with those with P42 MOG-IgG (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.11-3.03; P = .02). Those with UON at onset and non-P42 MOG-IgG demonstrated more than double the risk of relapsing course relative to those with P42 MOG-IgG (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.26-5.00; P = .01).

READ MORE: Health Canada Approves Inebilizumab as Treatment for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

Patients with TM and non-P42 MOG-IgG showed 2.3-higher hazard of relapsing course than those with P42 MOG-IgG, although this did not reach statistical significant (95% CI, 0.90-5.85; P = .08). Among those who had a sample collected before the first relapse, results showed that those with onset UON and non-P42 MOG-IgG exhibited more than double the risk of exhibiting a relapsing course than those with BON and P42 MOG-IgG (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.06-6.98; P = .038). Notably, relapse freedom in these patients lasted significantly short than those with P42 MOG-IgG (P = .0042).

"The overall risk of a relapsing course in patients whose MOG-IgG recognized a non-P42 epitope was over three times higher than those who recognized the immunodominant P42 epitope," the study authors wrote. "A seropositive non-P42 MOG-IgG test predicted a relapsing course in adult patients with UON with high specificity and positive predictive value. This association was particularly robust at disease onset, making MOG-IgG epitope detection a reliable predictor that can be tested before the occurrence of the first relapse."

At onset, MOG-IgG-seropositive patients mainly presented with UON (38%; n = 76), BON (30%; n = 61), TM (17%; n = 35%) or brain (7%; n = 14). A quarter of patients with UON and a third with TM had non-P42 MOG-IgG. Detection of the non-P42 epitope was associated with a relapsing course in 95% of UON and 92% of TM, but only in 69% and 75% of BON or brain patients, respectively. Overall, these results support the notion that non-P42 MOG-IgG combined with onset UON strongly predicts MOGAD relapsing disease.

REFERENCE
1. Liyanage G, Trewin BP, Lopez JA, et al. The MOG antibody non-P42 epitope is predictive of a relapsing course in MOG antibody-associated disease. Journal of Neurol, Neurosurg, & Psych. Published online January 30, 2024. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2023-332851
Related Videos
Joseph Kuchling, MD
Emilio Portaccio, MD
Marcello Moccia, MD, PhD
Mikael Cohen, MD
Wallace Brownlee, MBChB, PhD, FRACP
Tom Fuchs, MD, PhD
Valentin Krüger, MD
Shamik Bhattacharyya, MD
 Christina J. Azevedo, MD
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.